FIND

  Search for:    

 
Activities > Tuberculosis > Diagnostics

Tuberculosis

 

Background

Need for better diagnostics

What FIND is doing:

Product pipeline

FIND TB Partners

Related links

Need for better diagnostics

Microscopy center

Microscopy Center (peripheral laboratory level), Ethiopia (photo: WHO)
The mainstay for Tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in disease endemic developing countries is sputum smear microscopy developed in the 1880s and which has remained essentially unchanged since then. Microscopy is an attractive technology platform for public-health programs: it consists of one piece of equipment (the microscope); can be used for more than one purpose; provides visual evidence and in most instances is specific enough not to require confirmatory testing.

However, the sensitivity of this technology is low: it can only detect roughly half of all active cases of tuberculosis when properly used, and in areas struck by the HIV epidemic, where co-infections are frequent, as well as in children, the sensitivity is even lower. Moreover, though routinely described as a simple technology, microscopy is actually complex, and highly dependent on the training and diligence of the microscopist, requiring multiple examinations. Furthermore, under programmatic conditions it may take days rather than hours to complete, with the consequence that many patients drop out during the diagnostic process.

Health Post

Health Post (primary health care level), Lima, Peru (photo: FIND)
The lack of accurate, robust, and rapid diagnostics impedes tuberculosis patient management and disease control. For communities, the risk of transmission from undetected cases requires widespread access to diagnostic services and early detection. Unfortunately, diagnostic services in most places where tuberculosis is endemic fail both the individual and the community. Patients are often diagnosed after weeks to months of waiting, at substantial cost to themselves, and at huge cost to society. Many patients are never diagnosed and contribute to the astonishing number of yearly deaths from tuberculosis worldwide.

More than one type of test is needed for the different levels of the health care system: a point-of-care test for use at primary health care level (health post) where the majority of patients seek medical attention but where diagnosis is currently based on clinical signs and symptoms only; at the peripheral laboratory level or the health center or district hospital, an alternative to microscopy, with a simpler technology that can detect both the smear-positive and smear-negative tuberculosis; and at the district and national reference laboratory level, faster substitutes to culture for detecting smear-negative tuberculosis, improved antibiotic susceptibility testing, and tests for the detection of latent infection.

Referral laboratory

Referral laboratory (national reference laboratory level), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (photo: FIND)
FIND is prioritizing tests that can be adopted at the lowest level of the health system, where a large number of patients first seek care. The technologies targeted for each level are intended to match the human resources available and the degree of complexity of the diagnostic question.

Some of the diagnostic tools expected to be introduced into control programs will be incremental improvements on existing technologies while others will be radically new. The speed and extent of adoption of new technologies will depend on the balance between the benefits they bring and the degree of disruption their implementation causes. For instance, a simplified microscopy method may see greater adoption than a novel alternative that necessitates changes in the way testing or case notification are carried out. On the other hand, a new method that rapidly identifies all smear-positive and many smear-negative cases might, if suitably robust and specific, see widespread use and could substantially replace microscopy.